New plots added to my <a href="http://bicep.caltech.edu/~spuder/analysis_logbook/analysis/20121216_FTS/">posting</a>.<div><br></div><div>I&#39;ve analyzed the data for dk90 and dk270 and compared the spectra on the rgls of tile 4.  The derived band centers and band widths are all within 1 GHz of eachother.</div>
<div><br></div><div>We&#39;ve taken data at different speeds and at more than 4 pointings and the analysis of these is ongoing.</div><div><br></div><div>-Jon<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Jon Kaufman <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:jkaufman@physics.ucsd.edu" target="_blank">jkaufman@physics.ucsd.edu</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi All,<div><br></div><div>We&#39;ve taken the telescope off the mount, gotten it running in the lab, and have started taking FTS data.  So far we have total FPU coverage at two dks 90 degrees apart and are working on two more dk angles.  I&#39;ve made a first pass posting with the analysis just for tile 4 rgls at the first two dk angles: <a href="http://bicep.caltech.edu/~spuder/analysis_logbook/analysis/20121216_FTS/" target="_blank">http://bicep.caltech.edu/~spuder/analysis_logbook/analysis/20121216_FTS/</a>.  I&#39;m furiously analyzing the rest of the data now and this posting will expand exponentially for each subsequent satellite pass.  Lots of feedback would be greatly appreciated as we need to pull the trigger on warming very soon.</div>

<div><br></div><div>thanks</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>-Jon</div>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>