Hi,
Immanuel, thanks for reminding us: we want lensing sims. I'd forgotten. As for those sims, John, it sounds like you advocate doing a separate suite of signal only lensed EnoB sims. (Immanuel, I think that given that B-mode power from lensing is inherently a distortion of E-modes in Q and U, I don't see how to include it as an additional signal in BnoE.)
> additional signal = some atmospheric model?
What is the proposal?
By "atmospheric model" I actually meant to write "galactic model." I was not advocating we try to come up with some, say, ice crystal model. It sounds like there is a concrete proposal on the table for separate, scalable galactic foreground maps we can add into our regular maps. One question: will there only be one such galactic input sky, or will there be one for each realization?
Could signal-only tag subsets be made to more closely match full-season coadds by forcing weights at the pairmap coadd stage to match the effective pairmap weights for the full-season coadd? Seems like this could be made to work. It may be worth the effort, particularly if we consider further expanding the varieties of signal sims.
Likely. We have never really checked to see if it's fine as is. It sounds like signal only sims might be multiplying, so we should probably look into this, at least for use with the EnoB and perhaps tensor-BnoEnoT sims.
-Chris
-Chris