Om. Already Daisy had guessed that there was something disgraceful.
Daisy remembered, too, that after Diana's supposed death her husband had
come to England. And then for one moment Jeannie's spirit rose in
impotent revolt against the bitter cruelty of this chance by which Daisy
had seen Diana's photograph. She herself, perhaps, had been careless and
culpable, in putting it on her table; but she had been so preoccupied
with all the perplexities of this last week that the danger had not ever
so faintly occurred to her. But now by this fatal oversight Daisy had
already guessed perilously near the truth. She herself could invent no
story to account for these things, and if Daisy was told the whole
truth, of which she guessed so much, that other bitterness, the sense
that Jeannie had cruelly betrayed her, would be removed. She could
comfort Daisy again, and (this was sweet to herself also) show her how
she loved her. She had done her very best to keep her promise to Diana,
and she had no
Re treated as if partially insane. The writer when a boy attended the
trial of a cause between two neighbors in a court of low grade. It was
what was called a "cow case," and involved property worth, perhaps, as
much as twenty dollars. One of the witnesses on the stand was asked by a
lawyer, who wanted to embarrass or discredit him, if he were not an
Abolitionist. Objection came from the other side on the ground that the
inquiry was irrelevant; but the learned justice-of-the-peace who
presided held that, as it related to the witness's sanity, and that
would affect his credibility, the question was admissible. It is not,
perhaps, so very strange that in those days, in view of the
disreputableness of those whose cause
are obnoxious; yet, since the _Nasturtia_ are singly, and alone as it
were, the most effectual, and powerful Agents in conquering and
expugning that cruel Enemy; it were enough to give the _Sallet-Dresser_
direction how to choose, mingle, and proportion his Ingredients; as well
as to shew what Remedies there are contain'd in our Magazine of
_Sallet-Plants_ upon all Occasions, rightly marshal'd and skilfully
apply'd. So as (with our [52]sweet _Cowley_) _If thro' the strong and
beauteous Fence_ _Of Temperance and Innocence,_ _And wholsome Labours,
and a quiet Mind,_ _Diseases passage find;_ _They must not think here to
assail_ _A Land unarm'd, or without Guard,_ _They must fight for it, and
dispute it hard,_ _Before they can prevail;_ _Scarce any Plant is used
here,_ _Which 'gainst some Aile a Weapon does not bear_. We have said
how necessary it is, that in the Composure of a _Sallet_, every Plant
should come in to bear its part, without being over-power'd by some Herb
of a stronger Taste, so as to endanger the native _Sapor_ and vertue of
the rest; but fall into their places, like the _Notes_ in _Music_, in
He maintainer of an opinion contrary to my own judgment. I am bound in
duty to maintain those arguments which are most useful to Captain
Knowles, as far as is consistent with truth; and if his conduct has been
agreeable to the laws throughout, I am under a further indispensable
duty to support it.' Much reference was made to the ancient laws of
villenage, or semi-slavery, in Britain. Mr Dunning maintained, that
these were testimony that a slave was not an utter anomaly in the
country. The class of villeins had disappeared, and the law regarding
them was abolished in the reign of Charles II. But he maintained, that
there was nothing in that circumstance to prohibit others from
establishing a claim upon separate grounds. He said: 'If the statute of
Charles II. ever be repealed, the law of villenage revives in its full
force.' It was stated that there were in Britain 15,000 negroes in the
same position with Somerset. They had come over as domestics during the
temporary sojourn of their owner-masters, intending to go back again.
Then it was observed, that many of the slaves were in ships or in
colonies which had not special laws for the support of slavery; and by
the disfranchisement of these, British subjects would lose many
millions' worth of property, which they believed themselves justly to
possess. British justice, however, has held at all times the question of
human liberty to be superior to considerations of mere expediency. If
the question be, who gains or loses most, there never can be a doubt
that the man whose freedom has been reft from him has the greatest of
all claims