29 Mar
2005
29 Mar
'05
2:42 p.m.
PSTUM-List,
Our spring semester starts in February, so it's still midterm time around
here. I'm curious to know what some of you do around midterm time...
(a) to determine which of your instructors are struggling in the classroom
and
(b) to intervene and assist those instructors with their teaching while
there is still time left in the semester.
Here is what we do...
(a) Each of our calculus instructors (graduate students and junior faculty)
are observed by a member of the preceptor group during the first half of the
semester. Each of these observations is followed by a 20-30 minute
consultation where the preceptor and the instructor discuss the class
observed. One goal of this consultation is to identify three things the
teacher is doing well and three suggestions for improvement.
We also have all (well, most) of our calculus students complete midterm
course evaluations. Each of our calculus instructors then meets with his or
her course head to discuss these evaluations.
(b) Our interventions depend on the types of problems that are discovered
through the observation and midterm course evaluations. Typically one of
the preceptors mentors the teacher for a time, checking over their lesson
plans and offering advice. These interventions have been fairly ad hoc.
We're currently working on a "menu" of professional development options to
present to these teachers.
What are some of your practices?
Derek
--
Derek Bruff, Preceptor
Department of Mathematics, Harvard University
Email: bruff(a)fas.harvard.edu
Web: http://www.derekbruff.com/
29 Mar
29 Mar
3:34 p.m.
In describing their practices, it might be useful to people to share
more detail.
For ex., there are different ways of structuring observations (e.g.,
the person being observed does/doesn't identify ahead of time a
particular issue or practice that s/he'd like feedback on, the
teacher is/isn't videotaped, the "observation" does/doesn't attend
explicitly to elements of teaching that occur outside of the
classroom, such as planning and giving student written feedback) and
of eliciting feedback from students, both in terms of the foci of the
questions (e.g., general strengths and weakness, specific teaching
practices) and their structure (e.g., closed questions w/ 1-5 scales,
open-ended questions).
Dara
At 2:42 PM -0500 3/29/05, Derek Bruff wrote:
PSTUM-List,
Our spring semester starts in February, so it's still midterm time around
here. I'm curious to know what some of you do around midterm time...
(a) to determine which of your instructors are struggling in the classroom
and
(b) to intervene and assist those instructors with their teaching while
there is still time left in the semester.
Here is what we do...
(a) Each of our calculus instructors (graduate students and junior faculty)
are observed by a member of the preceptor group during the first half of the
semester. Each of these observations is followed by a 20-30 minute
consultation where the preceptor and the instructor discuss the class
observed. One goal of this consultation is to identify three things the
teacher is doing well and three suggestions for improvement.
We also have all (well, most) of our calculus students complete midterm
course evaluations. Each of our calculus instructors then meets with his or
her course head to discuss these evaluations.
(b) Our interventions depend on the types of problems that are discovered
through the observation and midterm course evaluations. Typically one of
the preceptors mentors the teacher for a time, checking over their lesson
plans and offering advice. These interventions have been fairly ad hoc.
We're currently working on a "menu" of professional development options to
present to these teachers.
What are some of your practices?
Derek
--
Derek Bruff, Preceptor
Department of Mathematics, Harvard University
Email: bruff(a)fas.harvard.edu
Web: http://www.derekbruff.com/
_______________________________________________
PSTUM-list mailing list
PSTUM-list(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/pstum-list
31 Mar
31 Mar
5:09 p.m.
More detail is a good idea, and I would be glad to give some more details on
what we're doing here currently. I'm hoping that my request for sharing of
midterm intervention strategies will generate some fruitful conversations on
this list. It seems to me that there should be more sharing of useful
strategies and ideas among those of us who are training undergraduate
mathematics teachers (graduate students and otherwise). I'm eager to hear
what other people do during the middle of the term to support their charges!
Here are some more details on our classroom observations...
We send an email to each of our calculus instructors early in the semester
letting them know that they will be observed by a preceptor and letting them
know the reasons for these observations -- to provide training and mentoring
to our calculus teachers and to help deliver the highest quality instruction
to our calculus students. Each instructor is assigned to a preceptor who
then contacts that instructor to arrange an observation. Before the
observation, the preceptor and instructor meet and address the following
questions.
1) In what ways do you feel the class is going well?
2) Do you have any concerns about the course or the students? If so, what
are they?
3) Are there any specific issues for which the observer should look during
class?
4) What are your teaching and/or content goals for the particular class
being observed?
This provides the instructor a chance to reflect on his or her teaching,
which is a good thing in and of itself. It also gives the preceptor an idea
of things to look for during the observation. Also, if the instructor has
an answer to question 3, then the instructor is more likely to buy in to the
whole process since they will be looking forward to our feedback on that
issue.
During the observation, the preceptor sits quietly in the back of the class
and watches the instructor, the students, and their interactions. We're
currently developing a checklist of sorts which lists things to look for.
The current draft features ten clusters: preparation, opening, content,
delivery, activities, technology, knowledge of students, questioning,
student participation, and closing. Checklist might be a misleading term,
since the list is not intended to be checked off. Instead it's more of a
reminder of areas of class to observe.
After the observation, the instructor and the preceptor meet again for a
debriefing. We typically give the instructor a chance to share his or her
thoughts on the class first, then expand on these observations with our own.
The goal of this debriefing is to identity 2-3 strengths of the instructors
teaching and 2-3 areas which could be improved, along with specific
suggestions for improvements. All of this goes into a report/note written
by the preceptor. The instructor is given a copy of the report, and a copy
is archived for future follow-up.
What about other people? How do you conduct mid-semester classroom
observations?
Derek
On 3/29/05 3:34 PM, "Dara Sandow" <sandowda(a)msu.edu> wrote:
In describing their practices, it might be useful to
people to share
more detail.
For ex., there are different ways of structuring observations (e.g.,
the person being observed does/doesn't identify ahead of time a
particular issue or practice that s/he'd like feedback on, the
teacher is/isn't videotaped, the "observation" does/doesn't attend
explicitly to elements of teaching that occur outside of the
classroom, such as planning and giving student written feedback) and
of eliciting feedback from students, both in terms of the foci of the
questions (e.g., general strengths and weakness, specific teaching
practices) and their structure (e.g., closed questions w/ 1-5 scales,
open-ended questions).
Dara
--
Derek Bruff, Preceptor
Department of Mathematics, Harvard University
Email: bruff(a)fas.harvard.edu
Web: http://www.derekbruff.com/
6989
days inactive
6991
days old
pstum-list@lists.fas.harvard.edu
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Dara Sandow -
Derek Bruff