Hi Walt,
It looks to me that this would also be an excellent way to probe for
consistency of the pairmaps going into the CMB coadds. Is that right?
Clem
--
**********************************************************************
Clem Pryke - Associate Professor - Physics
University of Minnesota,
Room 313 Tate, 116 Church Street S.E. Minneapolis, MN, 55455
Tel: 612-624-7578 Fax: 612-624-4578 email: pryke(a)physics.umn.edu
**********************************************************************
I've put up a new posting on per-pair galactic maps. The per-pair maps
are compared with appropriately cut and weighted full-coadd maps to
give a consistency parameter for each pair. This can be used to cut
pairs where there's something odd in the galactic maps. Most of the
flagged pairs are probably just suffering from some remaining relgain
mismatch, but there are a few that have genuine pathologies.
http://bicep.caltech.edu/~spuder/analysis_logbook/analysis/20131008_gal_cha…
- Walt
Forwarding on Justus' gmail (I think the original bounced).
J
Subject: Justus' interim email address
From: Justus Brevik <justusbrevik(a)gmail.com>
Date: 10/8/13 12:46 PM
To: bicep2-list-bounces(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
Hey folks,
Please use this email to get in touch with me during the shutdown:
justusbrevik(a)gmail.com
Thanks,
Justus
--
___________________________________________________________________
John Kovac jmkovac(a)cfa.harvard.edu
Associate Professor, Harvard University Astronomy Department
160 Concord Ave rm 310, Cambridge MA 02138, 617-496-0611
http://bicep0.caltech.edu/~spuder/analysis_logbook/analysis/20131007_satcom…
In data through 2012, the GOES transmitter has sometimes been left on
after the end of the GOES pass. (This is confirmed by the satellite
crew via Robert.) There are dozens of affected BEH phases, in which we
point directly at the radome while it's accidentally transmitting.
These are the ones that should be the "clean" half of the az jack. I
have made a partial list of affected tags based on the ground-fixed std
parameter. I also try to make a more reliable template-based parameter,
but this doesn't come out well because the signal is weak and varies
over time for some tag flavors.
> proceeding with planning for the coming season as usual until they hear
> otherwise from NSF.
> As far as our Keck deployment team goes, for now we should do the same.
I second this - for the time being we assume that the season is going ahead as
planned - and it probably will.
Clem
--
**********************************************************************
Clem Pryke - Associate Professor - Physics
University of Minnesota,
Room 313 Tate, 116 Church Street S.E. Minneapolis, MN, 55455
Tel: 612-624-7578 Fax: 612-624-4578 email: pryke(a)physics.umn.edu
**********************************************************************
John and Clem,
Are there any truth in this?
http://www.nature.com/news/us-antarctic-research-season-is-in-jeopardy-1.13…
I have yet to get PQ.
-Hien
_________________________________________________
Hien Trong Nguyen
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, MS 169-506
4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA 91109
(818) 354-0560, htnguyen(a)jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:htnguyen@jpl.nasa.gov>
