I'm attaching a draft of my SPIE Proceedings for comments. The submission
deadline has already passed, but I've been given an extension until June 13.
Things to think about while reading:
In previous SPIEs we have given a full author list. I can take the BICEP2
author list from the paper, but I don't know if we have a final Keck author
list.
Do we want to submit this to the arxiv? My understanding of the SPIE
copyright is that we have to submit to the arxiv first if we do so at all.
The introduction is pretty light on references; I'd appreciate suggestions
for a few key ones people think are worth adding.
I'm trying to stay away from anything controversial related to the BICEP2
results and foregrounds. SPIE is not the right venue for it.
Section 2 naturally has a lot of overlap with the upcoming beams paper.
Abby especially, I'd appreciate your thoughts here.
I put in our latest analysis of the 100 GHz NET and a placeholder for 100
GHz map depth. If we don't feel the 100 GHz map depth is ready to publish,
I plan to just say it is already deeper than BICEP1.
Note: I used the online collaborative paper-writing tool authorea.com (spin
off of Harvard CfA) to write these proceedings.
Immanuel Buder
Postdoctoral Fellow
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
(office) 617 495 7567
(office) 160 Concord Ave., M-114C
(mail) 60 Garden St. MS 42
Cambridge, MA 02138
ibuder(a)gmail.com
<ibuder(a)cfa.harvard.edu>
> If we don't feel the 100 GHz map depth is ready to publish, I plan to just
> say it is already deeper than BICEP1.
Until we have a proper abscal you shouldn't give a specific number.
Clem
--
**********************************************************************
Clem Pryke - Associate Professor - Physics
University of Minnesota
Room 318 Physics and Nanotechnology Building
115 Union Street SE, Minneapolis MN 55455
Tel: 612-624-7578 Fax: 612-624-4578 email: pryke(a)physics.umn.edu
**********************************************************************
