Hi all,
I have a question about these files. I have all the information
necessary to immediately create the per-detector abscal values in the
CSV file, but there's a second column which is the slope. This isn't
standard information returned from reduc_abscal(), so the question
(probably for Sarah since the 2013 file points to her posting) is: how
is the slope defined? Is it supposed to be the slope of a linear fit
over the same bands that are used to fit the abscal?
It'll take me a bit to code up the extra analysis, but I think the maps
still exist on disk so it should only require a run of reduc_abscal().
Justin
On 07/04/2015 10:40 AM, Clem Pryke wrote:
It seems there is an error in the diff ellip sub
(dp1102) for all 2014
analysis so far - see below.
Clem
Subject: 2014 per detector abscals
From: Clem Pryke <pryke(a)physics.umn.edu>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 01:50:46 -0500
To: Justin Willmert <willmert(a)physics.umn.edu>
Cc: pryke(a)physics.umn.edu
Justin,
It looks like in this post:
http://bicep.caltech.edu/~spuder/keck_analysis_logbook/analysis/20141211_ke…
14_perdet-abscals
you derived 2014 per detector abscals. But these don't appear to have been
committed to the aux_data/abscal directory.
This means we are analyzing 2014 data using 2013 abscal numbers. I am not sure
of the impact of this. But since these numbers are used for the scaling of the
subtraction coefficients it likely means that dp1102 is not being done
correctly.
Please put this file in place asap.
Clem
--
Justin Willmert — Graduate Student, Physics
University of Minnesota
Tate Lab, 116 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455
willmert(a)physics.umn.edu