Hi Sergi, Convolved to a circular Gaussian of FWHM = 35 arcmin, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, Did those already exist, or are you saying we should use a map convolved with a wider beam to roll off high ell? I think instead we should take the same BBNS B(l) we've been using and multiply it by some apodizing function. That way it has the same slope as our real beam in the ell range we care about. -Chris On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Sergi R. Hildebrandt < srh.jpl.caltech(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hi Guys, > > In today's telecon notes, Walt writes: "Should we be smoothing deproj > template to roll off ell that we don’t care about?" > > I have written 9 deprojection files to be found in: > /input_maps/planck/planck_derivs_nopix_smoothed > > Permissions OK and a README file. In summary they are: > > Planck 143 GHz > Deconvolved from Planck official beam. > Deconvolved from pixel window function at N_SIDE=2048 > Rotated from G to C coordinates > Downgraded to N_SIDE=512 > Deconvolved from the pixel window function at N_SIDE=512 > Convolved to a circular Gaussian of FWHM = 35 arcmin, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, > > Sergi > > _______________________________________________ > Bicep2-list mailing list > Bicep2-list(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu > https://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/bicep2-list > > -- ********************************************************************** Christopher Sheehy KICP Fellow, University of Chicago 5640 S Ellis Ave LASR 122 Chicago, IL 60637 office: (773) 702-9751 ********************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Bicep2-list mailing list Bicep2-list(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu https://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/bicep2-list