Once we are messing with a non constant T->B
leakage "smooth function"
in fourier space we are talking about a beam effect.
I agree in the sense that such a leakage has a corresponding "effective
difference beam". However I have a feeling that such effective difference
beams do not necessarily correspond simply with actual physical difference
beams. There again given the constraint that the effect must be uniform across
the focal plane to pass deck jack then perhaps they do.
Starting from the observed TB in the
fourier space as you are advocating will be a faster way to find the right
"beam effect", comparing to what Chris and Jamie are doing right now
in real space.
So it is unambiguous? Does a given TB pattern imply one - and only one -
effective difference beam?
Clem
--
**********************************************************************
Clem Pryke - Associate Professor - Physics
University of Minnesota,
Room 313 Tate, 116 Church Street S.E. Minneapolis, MN, 55455
Tel: 612-624-7578 Fax: 612-624-4578 email: pryke(a)physics.umn.edu
**********************************************************************