I don't see anything since John's email on
Friday morning - which I mostly agree with.
No, no one responded. Thank you for taking it on--your plan below
sounds good.
J
On 11/12/13, 5:26 PM, Clem Pryke wrote:
I am just getting back to this - I don't see
anything since John's email on
Friday morning - which I mostly agree with.
If the hypothesis is that there is a real signal plus a systematic in Rx1
which cancels it then a concrete test plan is as follows:
- Scale the r=0.1 sims to r=0.3 and add to the signal+noise for all receivers
- In the Rx1 sig+noise sims scale the noise up until the B2xB2-B2xRx1 spectral
jack is not unlikely (i.e. the systematic is being modelled as just extra
noise).
- Look if the Rx1xRx1 auto spectrum then shows a detection - which it very well may
because it will be debiased with the *unscaled* noise which we believe to actually be
present in Rx1.
Walt/anyone: are you working on this or something similar? If not I will get on it
tomorrow morning.
Clem
--
___________________________________________________________________
John Kovac
Associate Professor, Harvard University Astronomy Department
160 Concord Ave rm 310, Cambridge MA 02138, 617-496-0611
jmkovac(a)cfa.harvard.edu
CURRENTLY AT SOUTH POLE
(If sending from within usap, use John.Kovac.Guest(a)usap.gov)