Hi Clem,
- When you fit for epsilon what area of the F-plane do
you use? presumably you
should restrict to the central area where TB "lobes" are?
I am not restricting the area of the F-plane in the fit. I thought of
doing this, but then convinced myself that the constructed relgain TB
already has good S/N and more power at low l (since it is based on TT)
so it is not necessary to restrict the F plane. You can see the match
between the radial distribution in the bottom row of my figure 1 is
pretty good. However, if we are really just concerned with the
innermost l bins we might consider what you mention next:
- You might try an extension which allows a radial
variation of the strength
of the coupling - our false B seems even more concentrated to low ell than T -
an exponential or power law rolloff.
This is something I can try. I am also going to put up a plot of the
"leaked B" compared to our real B so we can look for correlations.
-Jamie
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Clem Pryke <pryke(a)physics.umn.edu> wrote:
> Hi Jamie,
>
> Good posting although result not very encouraging.
>
- When you fit for epsilon what area of the F-plane do
you use? presumably you
should restrict to the central area where TB "lobes" are?
>
- You might try an extension which allows a radial
variation of the strength
of the coupling - our false B seems even more concentrated to low ell than T -
an exponential or power law rolloff.
>
> Clem
>
> --
> **********************************************************************
> Clem Pryke - Associate Professor - Physics
> University of Minnesota,
> Room 313 Tate, 116 Church Street S.E. Minneapolis, MN, 55455
> Tel: 612-624-7578 Fax: 612-624-4578 email: pryke(a)physics.umn.edu
> **********************************************************************
>
>