On 5/7/13 11:49 AM, Clem Pryke wrote:
I think we
should include it in the input spectrum for EnoB
I think it should be included explicitly in the map with non Gaussian
statistics as Stefan has shown us how to do.
I *think* it should be included in EnoB (becoming EnocosB) but not in BnoE
which should be pure r=0.1.
I think so too, as I said in my email--but I hope we can discuss this on
today's telecon. I think we want both lensed and unlensed LCDM (a
better name than EnocosB?), and we also want to know the phi map for
each lensing realization.
J
--
___________________________________________________________________
John Kovac jmkovac(a)cfa.harvard.edu
Assistant Professor, Astronomy and Physics, Harvard University
160 Concord Ave rm 310, Cambridge MA 02138, 617-496-0611