New subject: keck signal and deprojection files

26 Jul 2013

Hi Eric-

Thanks for looking at the maps!  We decided to use the BICEP2 b_l for the
Keck maps for the upcoming sim run.  In the most recent abscal, it doesn't
seem to make a huge difference, other than a couple of percentage abscal
offset.  I've cc-ed the Keck/BICEP2 list in case I've misunderstood.

-Sarah

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:06 PM, &lt;bullock(a)physics.umn.edu&gt; wrote:

...
  Hi Sarah,

 I just noticed that your 1350 simulations were made with
 input_maps/camb_planck2013_r0/map_unlens_n2048_rxxxx_sB2bbns_dNoNoi.fits
 signal maps and
 input_maps/camb_planck2013_r0/map_unlens_n0512_rxxxx_sB2bbns_dPl143.fits
 deprojection maps.

 It looks like those are using the B2 beamsize.  Should we be using the
 s30p10 input maps for Keck, instead?

 -Eric

Re: [Bicep2-list] keck signal and deprojection files