23 Oct
2013
23 Oct
'13
1:51 p.m.
Hi Sarah,
In your post it says:
type8=type7+0.2*type4
That's not right is it - the power spectrum scales with r but the map scales
as sqrt(r) - so for r=0.02 you want type7+0.4472*type4 don't you?
Clem
--
**********************************************************************
Clem Pryke - Associate Professor - Physics
University of Minnesota,
Room 313 Tate, 116 Church Street S.E. Minneapolis, MN, 55455
Tel: 612-624-7578 Fax: 612-624-4578 email: pryke(a)physics.umn.edu
**********************************************************************
23 Oct
23 Oct
2:13 p.m.
New subject: posting: spectral jack with r=0.02 systematic
It's not right - I realized my mistake as soon as I sent the email. So
this posting is showing that we are insensitive to r=0.004. Sorry!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Clem Pryke <pryke(a)physics.umn.edu> wrote:
Hi Sarah,
In your post it says:
type8=type7+0.2*type4
That's not right is it - the power spectrum scales with r but the map
scales
as sqrt(r) - so for r=0.02 you want type7+0.4472*type4 don't you?
Clem
--
**********************************************************************
Clem Pryke - Associate Professor - Physics
University of Minnesota,
Room 313 Tate, 116 Church Street S.E. Minneapolis, MN, 55455
Tel: 612-624-7578 Fax: 612-624-4578 email: pryke(a)physics.umn.edu
**********************************************************************
5:44 p.m.
New subject: posting: spectral jack with r=0.02 systematic
I am relieved--I was confused earlier this morning about why the 0.16
shift you report in sum_bpdev for the B2 vs rx1 spectral jack when B2 is
set to "r=0.02" was not 1/10th of the level of the failure we see, given
that the actual difference between the B2xB2 and B2xRx1 spectra is
comparable to r=0.2.
This should fix that.
John
On 10/23/13 2:13 PM, Sarah Stokes Kernasovskiy wrote:
It's not right - I realized my mistake as soon as
I sent the email. So
this posting is showing that we are insensitive to r=0.004. Sorry!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Clem Pryke <pryke(a)physics.umn.edu
<mailto:pryke@physics.umn.edu>> wrote:
Hi Sarah,
In your post it says:
--
___________________________________________________________________
John Kovac jmkovac(a)cfa.harvard.edu
Associate Professor, Harvard University Astronomy Department
160 Concord Ave rm 310, Cambridge MA 02138, 617-496-0611
type8=type7+0.2*type4
That's not right is it - the power spectrum scales with r but the
map scales
as sqrt(r) - so for r=0.02 you want type7+0.4472*type4 don't you?
Clem
--
**********************************************************************
Clem Pryke - Associate Professor - Physics
University of Minnesota,
Room 313 Tate, 116 Church Street S.E. Minneapolis, MN, 55455
Tel: 612-624-7578 <tel:612-624-7578> Fax: 612-624-4578
<tel:612-624-4578> email: pryke(a)physics.umn.edu
<mailto:pryke@physics.umn.edu>
**********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Bicep2-list mailing list
Bicep2-list(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
https://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/bicep2-list
10:06 p.m.
New subject: posting: spectral jack with r=0.02 systematic
I've put up the posting with r=0.02 signal added. The sum of bpdev now
shifts by 1.3.
http://bmode.caltech.edu/~spuder/analysis_logbook/analysis/20131023_r0p02_s…
Sarah
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:44 PM, John Kovac <jmkovac(a)cfa.harvard.edu> wrote:
I am relieved--I was confused earlier this morning about why the 0.16
shift you report in sum_bpdev for the B2 vs rx1 spectral jack when B2 is
set to "r=0.02" was not 1/10th of the level of the failure we see, given
that the actual difference between the B2xB2 and B2xRx1 spectra is
comparable to r=0.2.
This should fix that.
John
On 10/23/13 2:13 PM, Sarah Stokes Kernasovskiy wrote:
It's not right - I realized my mistake as
soon as I sent the email. So
this posting is showing that we are insensitive to r=0.004. Sorry!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Clem Pryke <pryke(a)physics.umn.edu
<mailto:pryke@physics.umn.edu>**> wrote:
Hi Sarah,
In your post it says:
--
______________________________**______________________________**_______
John Kovac jmkovac(a)cfa.harvard.edu
Associate Professor, Harvard University Astronomy Department
160 Concord Ave rm 310, Cambridge MA 02138, 617-496-0611
type8=type7+0.2*type4
That's not right is it - the power spectrum scales with r but the
map scales
as sqrt(r) - so for r=0.02 you want type7+0.4472*type4 don't you?
Clem
--
****************************************************************
**********
Clem Pryke - Associate Professor - Physics
University of Minnesota,
Room 313 Tate, 116 Church Street S.E. Minneapolis, MN, 55455
Tel: 612-624-7578 <tel:612-624-7578> Fax: 612-624-4578
<tel:612-624-4578> email: pryke(a)physics.umn.edu
<mailto:pryke@physics.umn.edu>
****************************************************************
**********
______________________________**_________________
Bicep2-list mailing list
Bicep2-list(a)lists.fas.harvard.**edu <Bicep2-list(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu>
https://lists.fas.harvard.edu/**mailman/listinfo/bicep2-list<https://lis…
3859
days inactive
3860
days old
bicep2-list@lists.fas.harvard.edu
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Clem Pryke -
John Kovac -
Sarah Stokes Kernasovskiy