31 May
2013
31 May
'13
5:30 p.m.
Slide 20: Are we ready to show a BICEP2 jackknife spectrum? I'd like to,
especially to show the error bars compared to r=0.1.
So anyone will be able to see what our sensitivity is? I for one don't want
to spur any competitors into action, not right now.
-Chris
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Immanuel Buder <ibuder(a)cfa.harvard.edu>wrote;wrote:
> I posted draft slides for my June 10 talk at CMB2013 (Okinawa) at
> http://bmode.caltech.edu/~spuder/talks/CMB_2013_06_buder.pdf
> The talk time is 35 minutes.
> Suggestions are appreciated, and I have some special requests for comment:
>
> Slide 2: I haven't decided whether to use this slide yet. I want something
> to underscore the importance of inflation B-mode experiments after Planck,
> but this may be too controversial. What do you think?
>
> Slide 6: Did I leave anyone out?
>
> Slide 19: I got this map from Angiola's recent posting
> http://bmode.caltech.edu/~spuder/analysis_logbook/analysis/20130517_new_3yr…
> I think the map-making is mature enough to show, but this is a map we
> haven't shown in public before. If we don't feel ready to show it, I
don't
> mind reverting to a previous analysis that has been shown before.
> For BICEP2 and Keck map noise I am using Clem's map depth/weighting scheme
> [
> http://bmode.caltech.edu/~spuder/analysis_logbook/analysis/20130513_map_dep…
> ]
Slide 20: Are we ready to show a BICEP2 jackknife spectrum? I'd like to,
especially to show the error bars compared to r=0.1.
>
> Slide 21: Do we have a recent posting showing how much improvement we get
> from the pureB estimator? The plot I have now is for Keck from a recent
> posting by Sarah. The most recent BICEP2 posting I could find was from
> early 2012 for the 0304 simset.
>
> Slide 22: The plots are from Jamie Tolan's presentation at the
> collaboration meeting. I don't think they've been shown in public before,
> but I think we're ready to show them as a demonstration of the matrix-based
> analysis we're working toward. Jamie especially, do you agree?
>
> Slide 24: I'd prefer to show a far-field A-B difference map here, but I
> can't find one that's public. From the main beams final report, I think
> http://bicep0.caltech.edu/~spuder/analysis_logbook/analysis/20121115_therm_…
the archival beam maps. Are we okay if I pick a map from there as an
> example to show?
>
> Slide 29: I'd like to include something about the Keck sidelobes since
> it's something I've been working on, but I realize it's new and we
don't
> have a guaranteed solution although there's good evidence for believing the
> new baffles will work.
>
>
>
> Immanuel Buder
> Postdoctoral Fellow
> Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
> (office) 617 495 7567
> (office) 160 Concord Ave., M-114C
> (mail) 60 Garden St. MS 42
> Cambridge, MA 02138
> ibuder(a)cfa.harvard.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> KeckArray mailing list
> KeckArray(a)lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/keckarray
>
>
--
**********************************************************************
Christopher Sheehy - Ph.D. candidate - University of Chicago
Research Specialist, University of Minnesota, Department of Physics
Room 220 Tate, 116 Church Street S.E. Minneapolis, MN, 55455
Tel: 612-625-1802 Fax: 612-624-4578 email: csheehy(a)uchicago.edu
**********************************************************************