Orders Resolved, attached are the results of the build, the current
jdip, and the map as it stands for Spring 1902.
Next move is on Friday after group meeting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAjuEGoWCWk
I will make a wiki page to post all these results on so we have a record.
Hi Quanta
We will meet tomorrow at 11:00 in 6-310. There will also be a talk at 2:00 by Xiaodi Wu in 6C-442. See you!
Eddie
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Edward Farhi
Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics
Director
Center for Theoretical Physics
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
6-300
Cambridge MA 02139
617 253 4871
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
_______________________________________________
qip mailing list
qip(a)mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/qip
Dear All,
There will be a talk tomorrow in the QIP seminar by
Xiaodi Wu (U Michigan)
where & when: 6C-442, 2-3pm, Friday, May 17
title: Robust randomness extraction from any weak sources
abstract:
(Almost) uniform bits are scarce resources in the real world, since
physical sources of randomness typically contain biases and
correlations. Classically, one can extract almost uniform randomness
from an arbitrary weak source with sufficient (min-)entropy using a
short *independent* uniform seed as a catalyst. However, it is known
that such a goal is impossible to achieve deterministically, or
without relying on any independence assumptions.
In this talk, we demonstrate that deterministic randomness extraction
is possible with the help of *untrusted* quantum devices, *without*
relying on any independence assumptions. Specifically, we construct a
deterministic procedure such that given an arbitrary weak source with
sufficient min-entropy and sufficiently many quantum devices, extracts
(almost) uniform bits (when it accepts). The devices may be prepared
by an adversary who may hold (quantum) side information of the source,
and as long as the source has sufficient min-entropy conditioned on
the adversary, the extracted bits are (almost) uniform conditioned on
the adversary as well. Additionally, our procedure is computationally
efficient and tolerate ~1% of noise in the quantum devices.
Based on joint work with Kai-Min Chung and Yaoyun Shi.
_______________________________________________
qip mailing list
qip(a)mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/qip
Here is the wiki page with the results/orders etc... This will be where
I post the new updates from now on.
https://aspuru.wikidot.com/diplomacy
Kind Regards,
Jon
--
Jonathan M. Welch
Aspuru-Guzik Lab
jwelch(a)fas.harvard.edu
France and Austria still need to send me build orders if you have them.
(I am well aware that the latter is my own team... however I suffered
from TDB disorder... I was too damn busy and forgot to discuss this with
them... *cough* )
Hey Everyone,
I haven't received any build orders for this round, so please email them to me if you want any units built since I am about to head out for the day.
Please have them to me by 10PM tonight and I will resolve them then and post the new map tomorrow.
Kind Regards,
Jon
Dear Friends,
On Thursday, May 16, there will be an ITAMP topical lunch discussion.
Tea Room (P-226) @ CfA (60 Garden Street)
Time: 12:00-1:30
As always pizza will be served.
Speaker: K. Rajibul Islam
Title: Probing many body physics with cold atom quantum simulator
Abstract:
Cold atomic systems constitute a near perfect platform for quantum
simulation, where a well controlled quantum system is experimentally tuned
to behave according to a many body quantum Hamiltonian. In this talk, I
will discuss a few examples of quantum simulation experiments with
ultracold trapped ions and Bosonic neutral atoms in an optical lattice. The
trapped ion system is most suitable for studying long range spin
Hamiltonians, and in particular frustrated spin models, that might result
in a highly degenerate ground state manifold and entanglement. I will
present experimental results from a quantum simulation of a frustrated
antiferromagnetic quantum Ising model with trapped Yb-171+ ions, where we
tune the range of interactions continuously and directly measure spin
correlation functions. I will also describe a quantum gas microscope set up
that is used to project a two dimensional optical lattice on a Bose
Einstein Condensate of Rb-87 atoms and detect the atoms with single site
resolution, for exploring many body physics involving Bose-Hubbard model
and quantum phase transitions.
Looking forward to seeing you there,
Misha Lemeshko
--
Dr. Mikhail Lemeshko
Institute for Theoretical Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics (ITAMP)
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics MS-14
60 Garden St.
Cambridge, MA 02138
U.S.A.
mlemeshko(a)cfa.harvard.edu
http://sites.google.com/site/mishalemeshko/
Tel. +1 (617) 496-7610
Fax +1 (617) 496-7668
Hi Quanta
Tomorrow (Tuesday) we will have a group meeting at 11:00 in 6-310 with Daniel Lidar. He is also speaking at 4:30 to the Physical Chemists.
Also today Umesh Vazirani is speaking at 4:15. At 3:45 are refreshments. This sounds interesting.
Best,
Eddie
Note -- Unusual day and time: QUANTUM HAMILTONIAN COMPLEXITY: THROUGH THE COMPUTATIONAL LENS
Theory Colloquium 2012/2013
Speaker: Umesh Vazirani
Speaker Affiliation: UC Berkeley
Date: 5-13-2013
Time: 3:45 PM - 4:15 PM
Location: 32-G882 (Hewlett); refreshments in G5 lounge
Abstract: The exponential complexity of quantum systems is a double-edged
sword: while making quantum computers possible it is also an enormous obstacle
to analyzing and understanding physical systems. Is there any way around this
curse of exponentiality? Here are three basic questions that explore this
issue:
1. Do `typical' quantum states that occur in Nature have succinct
(polynomial) description?
2. Can quantum systems at room temperature exhibit exponential complexity?
3. Is the scientific method sufficiently powerful to comprehend general
quantum systems?
Each of these issues is best studied through the computational lens as a
question about computation. The resulting questions lie at the core of
computational complexity theory. The first asks about the structure of
solutions to the quantum analog of SAT. The second asks whether there is a
quantum analog of the PCP theorem. And the third can be formulated as a
question about interactive proof systems with quantum polynomial time provers.
This is a very active area, with a number of recent breakthroughs and
many exciting open questions. In this talk I will try to summarize the state
of the art, while keeping the talk widely accessible.
I
_______________________________________________
qip mailing list
qip(a)mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/qip
Hi everyone,
This is a reminder for Prof. Vanicek's talk tomorrow from 2-3pm, details
copied below,
Best,
Stephanie
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stéphanie Valleau <stephanievalleau(a)gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:48 AM
Subject: Talk by Jiri Vanicek next Monday: “Increasing the Efficiency and
Accuracy of Time-resolved Electronic Spectra Calculations"
To: A-G Group <aspuru-list(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu>
*what:* CCB/ITAMP Talk by Jiri Vanicek
*when:* Monday May 13th from 2-3pm
*where:* Phillips Auditorium, 60 Garden St (ITAMP)
*abstract:*
*“Increasing the Efficiency and Accuracy of Time-resolved Electronic
Spectra Calculations"
*
*Jiri Vanicek*
Rigorous quantum-mechanical calculations of coherent ultrafast electronic
spectra remain difficult. I will present several approaches developed in
our group that increase the efficiency and accuracy of such calculations:
First, we justified the feasibility of evaluating time-resolved spectra of
large systems by proving that the number of trajectories needed for
convergence of the semiclassical
Dephasing Representation is independent of dimensionality. This method was
accelerated with the Cellular Dephasing Representation in which the number
of trajectories is further drastically reduced. The accuracy of potential
energy surfaces was increased by combining the Dephasing Representation
with accurate on-the-fly ab initio electronic structure calculations,
including nonadiabatic and spin-orbit couplings. Finally, the inherent
semiclassical approximation was removed in the exact quantum Gaussian
Dephasing Representation. Among other examples I will present an ab initio
semiclassical dynamics calculation of the time-resolved stimulated emission
spectrum of the 54-dimensional azulene and the theoretical justification of
the violation of Kasha’s rule of excited-state photochemistry in azulene,
using the Multiple Surface Dephasing Representation.