Hi everyone,
I’m giving a talk tomorrow in Rm 26-214 at 11:45 that might be of interest to some of you.
See the talk announcement below. There is pizza!
— Steve
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jacques J Carolan <carolanj(a)mit.edu <mailto:carolanj@mit.edu>>
Subject: Fwd: [iQuISE] Prof. Steve Flammia & the Fault Tolerance Threshold
Date: March 8, 2017 at 3:39:59 PM EST
To: "sflammia(a)gmail.com <mailto:sflammia@gmail.com>"
<sflammia(a)gmail.com <mailto:sflammia@gmail.com>>
All the best,
Jacques
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Sara <smouradi(a)mit.edu <mailto:smouradi@mit.edu>>
> Date: 8 March 2017 at 10:03:43 GMT-5
> To: <iquise-associates(a)mit.edu <mailto:iquise-associates@mit.edu>>
> Subject: [iQuISE] Prof. Steve Flammia & the Fault Tolerance Threshold
>
> Hello all,
>
> This week Professor Steve Flammia will give a talk on how experimentally measured
error rates can be related to the worst-case error rates for fault-tolerant thresholding.
>
> The talk will be in Rm 26-214 tomorrow (Thursday March 9th) at 12:00, with pizza
served at 11:45, as always!
>
> Thank you,
> iQuISE Leadership
>
>
> iQuISE Seminar Series
> Comparing Experiments to the Fault-Tolerance Threshold
>
>
> THURSDAY, March 9th, 2017
> 11:45 AM - 12:45 PM, ROOM 26-214
>
>
> Achieving error rates that meet or exceed the fault-tolerance threshold is a central
goal for quantum computing experiments, and measuring these error rates using randomized
benchmarking is now routine. However, direct comparison between measured error rates and
thresholds is complicated by the fact that benchmarking estimates average error rates
while thresholds reflect worst-case behavior. These two can differ by orders of magnitude
in the regime of interest. I will discuss how to facilitate comparison between the
experimentally accessible average error rates and the worst-case quantities that arise in
current threshold theorems by describing relations between the two for a variety of
physical noise sources, including dephasing, thermal relaxation, coherent and incoherent
leakage, as well as coherent unitary over and under rotation. The results indicate that it
is coherent errors that lead to an enormous mismatch between average and worst case, and
we quantify how well these errors must be controlled to ensure fair comparison between
average error probabilities and fault-tolerance thresholds. Finally, I will describe how a
recently introduced measure of coherent errors called the unitarity can sometimes be used
to directly quantify the distance to the threshold based on data collected from randomized
benchmarking experiments.
_______________________________________________
qip mailing list
qip(a)mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/qip