1 Feb
2010
1 Feb
'10
2:43 p.m.
Colleagues -
I am serving on the PCC Task Force on Non-Latin Script Cataloging
Documentation. This group has been charged with producing
"authoritative and comprehensive documentation on providing equivalent
fields in non-Latin scripts that provides for consistent application
across available scripts."
We are aware that in most records with Greek script currently in OCLC,
the diacritics that normally appear in Greek text are omitted. We have
also been told that is it technically possible to enter Greek script
with appropriate diacritics in OCLC by using the same MARC-8 combining
diacritics used by catalogers in OCLC for Latin script (see for example
the contents notes in OCLC record #428012280 for Progymnasmata quae
exstant omnia, with Greek script added by Brigham Young University; this
record passes OCLC validation).
The two diacritics needed for contemporary, post-1982 modern Greek
orthography can be entered reasonably easily in OCLC using the "Enter
Diacritics and Special Characters" menu. All the other diacritics
needed for pre-1982 and classical Greek can also be entered, but some
are not available from this menu in OCLC, and special keystroke
combinations need to be set up to produce them. Entering valid
combining diacritics in local systems before uploading records to OCLC
might present further complications.
All of this is quite different from the way Greek is usually entered and
encoded in other contexts on the Web, I think, and text with diacritics
produced by other methods cannot be copied into OCLC records.
The CoHSL list is the only place where I have found any discussion of
Greek diacritics in OCLC records (in a few messages from 2007). My
group will be recommending standards to be followed by the Library of
Congress and other participants in the Program for Cooperative
Cataloging. I would welcome any comments on whether we should recommend
that entering Greek diacritics should be encouraged or required for
items in post- and/or pre-1982 orthography, given that they would have
to be input as described above.
I would particularly like to hear from any catalogers in other libraries
currently entering Greek script in bibliographic records. Please
forward this message as appropriate.
Thank you,
Robert Rendall
--
Robert Rendall
Principal Serials Cataloger
Original and Special Materials Cataloging, Columbia University Libraries
102 Butler Library, 535 West 114th Street, New York, NY 10027
tel.: 212 851 2449 fax: 212 854 5167
2 Feb
2 Feb
3:56 p.m.
Dear Robert,
I want to thank you for getting in touch with the members of this list.
I would like to encourage CoHSL members who are not catalogers to
forward Robert's query to the appropriate people who are entering (or
will enter) the Greek script in catalogs.
The OCLC record that you gave as an example looks fine in OCLC but when
I looked at the record in our local system (HOLLIS) the diacritics are
in the wrong places: this is how it appears in our OPAC: Σηβ́ηρου
Σοφιστο͂υ ̓Αλεξ́ανδρου Διηγ́ηματα -- Σηβ́ηρου Σοφιστο͂υ ̓Αλεξ́ανδρου ̓Ηθοποίιαι.
(The diacritics are over the previous letter to where they should be.) I
am not sure if this problem is just with our system (ALEPH). If the
decision is made to use diactritics in the Greek records, this may pose
a problem with local databases so some testing should be done.
I spent a little time searching the OPACS of the Gennadius Library and
University of Crete, and found that they are following the post-1982
orthography, even for records prior to 1982, and also for classical
Greek entries. I believe that both these libraries use ALEPH as their
OPAC and their diacritics look fine It would be very helpful if our
Greek colleagues belonging to this list can offer input to their use of
diacritics, and to their thoughts on not using them at all, as has been
the case so far in OCLC.
Including the diacritics will require more knowledge of the language
since often times titles appear in all capital letters and the stress
marks are not included. The cataloger will have to know where the stress
belongs. Personally, I would like to see the diacritics included, but
only for the post-1982 orthography, as they do in Greece. But I am not
sure whether this is realistic given our limited cataloging resources
and the likelihood that the person cataloging a Greek book may not have
in-depth knowledge of the language.
CoHSL colleagues, please share your thoughts with the group!
Kind regards,
Rhea
Rhea K. Lesage
Head and Bibliographer for Modern Greek
Modern Greek Section
Collection Development Department
Widener Library
Harvard College Library
Cambridge, MA 02138
(617)495-3632
FAX (617)496-8704
Robert Rendall wrote:
Colleagues -
I am serving on the PCC Task Force on Non-Latin Script Cataloging
Documentation. This group has been charged with producing
"authoritative and comprehensive documentation on providing equivalent
fields in non-Latin scripts that provides for consistent application
across available scripts."
We are aware that in most records with Greek script currently in OCLC,
the diacritics that normally appear in Greek text are omitted. We have
also been told that is it technically possible to enter Greek script
with appropriate diacritics in OCLC by using the same MARC-8 combining
diacritics used by catalogers in OCLC for Latin script (see for example
the contents notes in OCLC record #428012280 for Progymnasmata quae
exstant omnia, with Greek script added by Brigham Young University; this
record passes OCLC validation).
The two diacritics needed for contemporary, post-1982 modern Greek
orthography can be entered reasonably easily in OCLC using the "Enter
Diacritics and Special Characters" menu. All the other diacritics
needed for pre-1982 and classical Greek can also be entered, but some
are not available from this menu in OCLC, and special keystroke
combinations need to be set up to produce them. Entering valid
combining diacritics in local systems before uploading records to OCLC
might present further complications.
All of this is quite different from the way Greek is usually entered and
encoded in other contexts on the Web, I think, and text with diacritics
produced by other methods cannot be copied into OCLC records.
The CoHSL list is the only place where I have found any discussion of
Greek diacritics in OCLC records (in a few messages from 2007). My
group will be recommending standards to be followed by the Library of
Congress and other participants in the Program for Cooperative
Cataloging. I would welcome any comments on whether we should recommend
that entering Greek diacritics should be encouraged or required for
items in post- and/or pre-1982 orthography, given that they would have
to be input as described above.
I would particularly like to hear from any catalogers in other libraries
currently entering Greek script in bibliographic records. Please
forward this message as appropriate.
Thank you,
Robert Rendall
3 Feb
3 Feb
8:10 a.m.
Hello Robert:
I am a member of the CoHSL list. I examined the record your sent in your message in OCLC
and brought the record into our Voyager system. The record came in with no problems and
the diacritics are all in the places where they should be.
While I share Rhea's concern that the appropriate diacritics should be included in
cataloging records, I am very concerned with the fact that given our limited cataloging
resources and staff declines, I cannot devote the time required to perform the adding of
diacritics to records. I am the person who would be doing this work and I have other
duties assigned to me.
I would be more than willing to discuss this issue in detail with other members of the
CoHSL list and I encourage them to contact me.
Thank you for your attention,
Tony Oddo
-----Original Message-----
From: cohsl-list-bounces(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
[mailto:cohsl-list-bounces@lists.fas.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Rhea Karabelas Lesage
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 3:56 PM
To: listserv for the Consortium of Hellenic Studies Librarians
Cc: David W Reser; Peter Fletcher; Robert Maxwell; Polyxeni Georgiadi
Subject: Re: [Cohsl-list] Greek script diacritics in OCLC records
Dear Robert,
I want to thank you for getting in touch with the members of this list.
I would like to encourage CoHSL members who are not catalogers to
forward Robert's query to the appropriate people who are entering (or
will enter) the Greek script in catalogs.
The OCLC record that you gave as an example looks fine in OCLC but when
I looked at the record in our local system (HOLLIS) the diacritics are
in the wrong places: this is how it appears in our OPAC: Σηβ́ηρου
Σοφιστο͂υ ̓Αλεξ́ανδρου Διηγ́ηματα -- Σηβ́ηρου Σοφιστο͂υ ̓Αλεξ́ανδρου ̓Ηθοποίιαι.
(The diacritics are over the previous letter to where they should be.) I
am not sure if this problem is just with our system (ALEPH). If the
decision is made to use diactritics in the Greek records, this may pose
a problem with local databases so some testing should be done.
I spent a little time searching the OPACS of the Gennadius Library and
University of Crete, and found that they are following the post-1982
orthography, even for records prior to 1982, and also for classical
Greek entries. I believe that both these libraries use ALEPH as their
OPAC and their diacritics look fine It would be very helpful if our
Greek colleagues belonging to this list can offer input to their use of
diacritics, and to their thoughts on not using them at all, as has been
the case so far in OCLC.
Including the diacritics will require more knowledge of the language
since often times titles appear in all capital letters and the stress
marks are not included. The cataloger will have to know where the stress
belongs. Personally, I would like to see the diacritics included, but
only for the post-1982 orthography, as they do in Greece. But I am not
sure whether this is realistic given our limited cataloging resources
and the likelihood that the person cataloging a Greek book may not have
in-depth knowledge of the language.
CoHSL colleagues, please share your thoughts with the group!
Kind regards,
Rhea
Rhea K. Lesage
Head and Bibliographer for Modern Greek
Modern Greek Section
Collection Development Department
Widener Library
Harvard College Library
Cambridge, MA 02138
(617)495-3632
FAX (617)496-8704
Robert Rendall wrote:
Colleagues -
I am serving on the PCC Task Force on Non-Latin Script Cataloging
Documentation. This group has been charged with producing
"authoritative and comprehensive documentation on providing equivalent
fields in non-Latin scripts that provides for consistent application
across available scripts."
We are aware that in most records with Greek script currently in OCLC,
the diacritics that normally appear in Greek text are omitted. We have
also been told that is it technically possible to enter Greek script
with appropriate diacritics in OCLC by using the same MARC-8 combining
diacritics used by catalogers in OCLC for Latin script (see for example
the contents notes in OCLC record #428012280 for Progymnasmata quae
exstant omnia, with Greek script added by Brigham Young University; this
record passes OCLC validation).
The two diacritics needed for contemporary, post-1982 modern Greek
orthography can be entered reasonably easily in OCLC using the "Enter
Diacritics and Special Characters" menu. All the other diacritics
needed for pre-1982 and classical Greek can also be entered, but some
are not available from this menu in OCLC, and special keystroke
combinations need to be set up to produce them. Entering valid
combining diacritics in local systems before uploading records to OCLC
might present further complications.
All of this is quite different from the way Greek is usually entered and
encoded in other contexts on the Web, I think, and text with diacritics
produced by other methods cannot be copied into OCLC records.
The CoHSL list is the only place where I have found any discussion of
Greek diacritics in OCLC records (in a few messages from 2007). My
group will be recommending standards to be followed by the Library of
Congress and other participants in the Program for Cooperative
Cataloging. I would welcome any comments on whether we should recommend
that entering Greek diacritics should be encouraged or required for
items in post- and/or pre-1982 orthography, given that they would have
to be input as described above.
I would particularly like to hear from any catalogers in other libraries
currently entering Greek script in bibliographic records. Please
forward this message as appropriate.
Thank you,
Robert Rendall
_______________________________________________
CoHSL-list mailing list
CoHSL-list(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/cohsl-list
23 Feb
23 Feb
3:10 p.m.
Colleagues -
Thank you to everyone who responded on- or off-list to my request for
comment! It seems clear that while there is no need to codify common
practice and forbid the use of Greek diacritics in PCC records, it would
also be unreasonable to require that they be added for any category of
material. The text that I have drafted for the document my task force
is preparing is as follows:
It is not required to enter the diacritics normally used with Greek
script in PCC records. However, these diacritics may be input using the
same MARC-8 combining diacritics that are used with Latin-script
records. For text printed in capital letters without diacritics, the
appropriate diacritics may be supplied. Catalogers may add diacritics
to existing records containing Greek script without diacritics. Once
input, diacritics that are correct should not be removed from master
records.
245 00 ?a ????? ??? ??????? ????????? ?????? : ?b (??)?????????
??????????????? ?????????.
245 00 ?a Opseis tou archaiou Elle?nikou kosmou : ?b (an)epikaires
archaiogno?stikes symvoules.
*/or:/*
245 00 ?a ?????? ??? ???????? ?????????? ??????? : ?b (??)??????????
???????????????? ??????????.
245 00 ?a Opseis tou archaiou Elle?nikou kosmou : ?b (an)epikaires
archaiogno?stikes symvoules.
I would welcome any further comment. I hope the import problems
experienced with Aleph can be resolved with a change in local settings.
Here at Columbia we are considering testing routine entry of diacritics
for original cataloging and for copy to which we add Greek script.
I also hope I understand correctly that since the 2009 changes to the
ALA-LC romanization tables for Greek, it is no longer required to supply
the rough breathing when transliterating words printed in monotonic
orthography (such as the fourth word in my title). If I have that
wrong, I'll correct it!
Robert.
Robert Rendall wrote:
Colleagues -
I am serving on the PCC Task Force on Non-Latin Script Cataloging
Documentation. This group has been charged with producing
"authoritative and comprehensive documentation on providing equivalent
fields in non-Latin scripts that provides for consistent application
across available scripts."
We are aware that in most records with Greek script currently in OCLC,
the diacritics that normally appear in Greek text are omitted. We
have also been told that is it technically possible to enter Greek
script with appropriate diacritics in OCLC by using the same MARC-8
combining diacritics used by catalogers in OCLC for Latin script (see
for example the contents notes in OCLC record #428012280 for
Progymnasmata quae exstant omnia, with Greek script added by Brigham
Young University; this record passes OCLC validation).
The two diacritics needed for contemporary, post-1982 modern Greek
orthography can be entered reasonably easily in OCLC using the "Enter
Diacritics and Special Characters" menu. All the other diacritics
needed for pre-1982 and classical Greek can also be entered, but some
are not available from this menu in OCLC, and special keystroke
combinations need to be set up to produce them. Entering valid
combining diacritics in local systems before uploading records to OCLC
might present further complications.
All of this is quite different from the way Greek is usually entered
and encoded in other contexts on the Web, I think, and text with
diacritics produced by other methods cannot be copied into OCLC records.
The CoHSL list is the only place where I have found any discussion of
Greek diacritics in OCLC records (in a few messages from 2007). My
group will be recommending standards to be followed by the Library of
Congress and other participants in the Program for Cooperative
Cataloging. I would welcome any comments on whether we should
recommend that entering Greek diacritics should be encouraged or
required for items in post- and/or pre-1982 orthography, given that
they would have to be input as described above.
I would particularly like to hear from any catalogers in other
libraries currently entering Greek script in bibliographic records.
Please forward this message as appropriate.
Thank you,
Robert Rendall
--
Robert Rendall
Principal Serials Cataloger
Original and Special Materials Cataloging, Columbia University Libraries
102 Butler Library, 535 West 114th Street, New York, NY 10027
tel.: 212 851 2449 fax: 212 854 5167
4:08 p.m.
Dear Robert,
Thank you for taking into consideration the concerns of those who responded to your call
for feedback. I think the allowing for the optional input of diacritics is an excellent
decision.
Re: the rough breathing-this is the first that I have heard of “2009 changes to the Greek
transliteration table”! When was this announced? Have other institutions begun dropping
the initial “h”, and if so, what kind of changes did they make to the authority file? What
about non-filing indicators for initial articles? There has been significant discussion
over this issue over the years re: the elimination of the rough breathing and the kind of
retrospective changes that will be required to accommodate this change. Both Barbara
Tillett and Robert Hiatt have been in touch with me personally, and the CoHSL in the past,
and I am truly stunned that we were not informed of this change! The last communication I
had with Hiatt was in Dec. 2008, and when he asked my advice for a possible change to the
tables. I responded in detail and never heard a reply. Now I understand why.
Robert, thank you for calling this to our attention.
Rhea
From: cohsl-list-bounces(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
[mailto:cohsl-list-bounces@lists.fas.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Robert Rendall
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:11 PM
To: cohsl-list(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
Cc: Peter Fletcher; David W Reser; Polyxeni Georgiadi; Irina Kandarasheva; Robert
Maxwell
Subject: Re: [Cohsl-list] Greek script diacritics in OCLC records
Colleagues -
Thank you to everyone who responded on- or off-list to my request for comment! It seems
clear that while there is no need to codify common practice and forbid the use of Greek
diacritics in PCC records, it would also be unreasonable to require that they be added for
any category of material. The text that I have drafted for the document my task force is
preparing is as follows:
It is not required to enter the diacritics normally used with Greek script in PCC records.
However, these diacritics may be input using the same MARC-8 combining diacritics that
are used with Latin-script records. For text printed in capital letters without
diacritics, the appropriate diacritics may be supplied. Catalogers may add diacritics to
existing records containing Greek script without diacritics. Once input, diacritics that
are correct should not be removed from master records.
245 00 ǂa Οψεις του αρχαιου Ελληνικου κοσμου : ǂb (αν)επικαιρες αρχαιογνωστικες
συμβουλες.
245 00 ǂa Opseis tou archaiou Ellēnikou kosmou : ǂb (an)epikaires archaiognōstikes
symvoules.
or:
245 00 ǂa Όψεις του αρχαίου Ελληνικού κόσμου : ǂb (αν)επίκαιρες αρχαιογνωστικές
συμβουλές.
245 00 ǂa Opseis tou archaiou Ellēnikou kosmou : ǂb (an)epikaires archaiognōstikes
symvoules.
I would welcome any further comment. I hope the import problems experienced with Aleph
can be resolved with a change in local settings. Here at Columbia we are considering
testing routine entry of diacritics for original cataloging and for copy to which we add
Greek script.
I also hope I understand correctly that since the 2009 changes to the ALA-LC romanization
tables for Greek, it is no longer required to supply the rough breathing when
transliterating words printed in monotonic orthography (such as the fourth word in my
title). If I have that wrong, I'll correct it!
Robert.
Robert Rendall wrote:
Colleagues -
I am serving on the PCC Task Force on Non-Latin Script Cataloging Documentation. This
group has been charged with producing "authoritative and comprehensive documentation
on providing equivalent fields in non-Latin scripts that provides for consistent
application across available scripts."
We are aware that in most records with Greek script currently in OCLC, the diacritics that
normally appear in Greek text are omitted. We have also been told that is it technically
possible to enter Greek script with appropriate diacritics in OCLC by using the same
MARC-8 combining diacritics used by catalogers in OCLC for Latin script (see for example
the contents notes in OCLC record #428012280 for Progymnasmata quae exstant omnia, with
Greek script added by Brigham Young University; this record passes OCLC validation).
The two diacritics needed for contemporary, post-1982 modern Greek orthography can be
entered reasonably easily in OCLC using the "Enter Diacritics and Special
Characters" menu. All the other diacritics needed for pre-1982 and classical Greek
can also be entered, but some are not available from this menu in OCLC, and special
keystroke combinations need to be set up to produce them. Entering valid combining
diacritics in local systems before uploading records to OCLC might present further
complications.
All of this is quite different from the way Greek is usually entered and encoded in other
contexts on the Web, I think, and text with diacritics produced by other methods cannot be
copied into OCLC records.
The CoHSL list is the only place where I have found any discussion of Greek diacritics in
OCLC records (in a few messages from 2007). My group will be recommending standards to be
followed by the Library of Congress and other participants in the Program for Cooperative
Cataloging. I would welcome any comments on whether we should recommend that entering
Greek diacritics should be encouraged or required for items in post- and/or pre-1982
orthography, given that they would have to be input as described above.
I would particularly like to hear from any catalogers in other libraries currently
entering Greek script in bibliographic records. Please forward this message as
appropriate.
Thank you,
Robert Rendall
--
Robert Rendall
Principal Serials Cataloger
Original and Special Materials Cataloging, Columbia University Libraries
102 Butler Library, 535 West 114th Street, New York, NY 10027
tel.: 212 851 2449 fax: 212 854 5167
4:32 p.m.
This was a surprise to me too when I first noticed it just a couple of
days ago, and when I was writing this message I wondered whether this
would be news to anyone else...
The tables are here:
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/roman.html
Robert.
Lesage, Rhea wrote:
Dear Robert,
Thank you for taking into consideration the concerns of those who
responded to your call for feedback. I think the allowing for the
optional input of diacritics is an excellent decision.
Re: the rough breathing-this is the first that I have heard of “2009
changes to the Greek transliteration table”! When was this announced?
Have other institutions begun dropping the initial “h”, and if so,
what kind of changes did they make to the authority file? What about
non-filing indicators for initial articles? There has been significant
discussion over this issue over the years re: the elimination of the
rough breathing and the kind of retrospective changes that will be
required to accommodate this change. Both Barbara Tillett and Robert
Hiatt have been in touch with me personally, and the CoHSL in the
past, and I am truly stunned that we were not informed of this change!
The last communication I had with Hiatt was in Dec. 2008, and when he
asked my advice for a possible change to the tables. I responded in
detail and never heard a reply. Now I understand why.
Robert, thank you for calling this to our attention.
Rhea
*From:* cohsl-list-bounces(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
[mailto:cohsl-list-bounces@lists.fas.harvard.edu] *On Behalf Of
*Robert Rendall
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:11 PM
*To:* cohsl-list(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
*Cc:* Peter Fletcher; David W Reser; Polyxeni Georgiadi; Irina
Kandarasheva; Robert Maxwell
*Subject:* Re: [Cohsl-list] Greek script diacritics in OCLC records
Colleagues -
Thank you to everyone who responded on- or off-list to my request for
comment! It seems clear that while there is no need to codify common
practice and forbid the use of Greek diacritics in PCC records, it
would also be unreasonable to require that they be added for any
category of material. The text that I have drafted for the document
my task force is preparing is as follows:
It is not required to enter the diacritics normally used with Greek
script in PCC records. However, these diacritics may be input using
the same MARC-8 combining diacritics that are used with Latin-script
records. For text printed in capital letters without diacritics, the
appropriate diacritics may be supplied. Catalogers may add diacritics
to existing records containing Greek script without diacritics. Once
input, diacritics that are correct should not be removed from master
records.
245 00 ǂa Οψεις του αρχαιου Ελληνικου κοσμου : ǂb (αν)επικαιρες
αρχαιογνωστικες συμβουλες.
245 00 ǂa Opseis tou archaiou Ellēnikou kosmou : ǂb (an)epikaires
archaiognōstikes symvoules.
*/or:/*
245 00 ǂa Όψεις του αρχαίου Ελληνικού κόσμου : ǂb (αν)επίκαιρες
αρχαιογνωστικές συμβουλές.
245 00 ǂa Opseis tou archaiou Ellēnikou kosmou : ǂb (an)epikaires
archaiognōstikes symvoules.
I would welcome any further comment. I hope the import problems
experienced with Aleph can be resolved with a change in local
settings. Here at Columbia we are considering testing routine entry
of diacritics for original cataloging and for copy to which we add
Greek script.
I also hope I understand correctly that since the 2009 changes to the
ALA-LC romanization tables for Greek, it is no longer required to
supply the rough breathing when transliterating words printed in
monotonic orthography (such as the fourth word in my title). If I
have that wrong, I'll correct it!
Robert.
Robert Rendall wrote:
Colleagues -
I am serving on the PCC Task Force on Non-Latin Script Cataloging
Documentation. This group has been charged with producing
"authoritative and comprehensive documentation on providing equivalent
fields in non-Latin scripts that provides for consistent application
across available scripts."
We are aware that in most records with Greek script currently in OCLC,
the diacritics that normally appear in Greek text are omitted. We
have also been told that is it technically possible to enter Greek
script with appropriate diacritics in OCLC by using the same MARC-8
combining diacritics used by catalogers in OCLC for Latin script (see
for example the contents notes in OCLC record #428012280 for
Progymnasmata quae exstant omnia, with Greek script added by Brigham
Young University; this record passes OCLC validation).
The two diacritics needed for contemporary, post-1982 modern Greek
orthography can be entered reasonably easily in OCLC using the "Enter
Diacritics and Special Characters" menu. All the other diacritics
needed for pre-1982 and classical Greek can also be entered, but some
are not available from this menu in OCLC, and special keystroke
combinations need to be set up to produce them. Entering valid
combining diacritics in local systems before uploading records to OCLC
might present further complications.
All of this is quite different from the way Greek is usually entered
and encoded in other contexts on the Web, I think, and text with
diacritics produced by other methods cannot be copied into OCLC records.
The CoHSL list is the only place where I have found any discussion of
Greek diacritics in OCLC records (in a few messages from 2007). My
group will be recommending standards to be followed by the Library of
Congress and other participants in the Program for Cooperative
Cataloging. I would welcome any comments on whether we should
recommend that entering Greek diacritics should be encouraged or
required for items in post- and/or pre-1982 orthography, given that
they would have to be input as described above.
I would particularly like to hear from any catalogers in other
libraries currently entering Greek script in bibliographic records.
Please forward this message as appropriate.
Thank you,
Robert Rendall
--
Robert Rendall
Principal Serials Cataloger
Original and Special Materials Cataloging, Columbia University Libraries
102 Butler Library, 535 West 114th Street, New York, NY 10027
tel.: 212 851 2449 fax: 212 854 5167
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CoHSL-list mailing list
CoHSL-list(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/cohsl-list
5198
days inactive
5220
days old
cohsl-list@lists.fas.harvard.edu
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Lesage, Rhea -
Oddo, Anthony -
Rhea Karabelas Lesage
-
Robert Rendall